BT 0.56

Started by Corsair, May 19, 2010, 09:36:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Corsair

Quote- Add: Computer: Sorting.

I don't know but I guess that is not working properly.

now the sorting in computers same range:
descending IP, ascending port (port the same for all)
localhost
xxx.xxx.1.6
xxx.xxx.1.5
xxx.xxx.1.3
xxx.xxx.1.100

but supposed to be:

xxx.xxx.1.3
xxx.xxx.1.5
xxx.xxx.1.6
xxx.xxx.1.100
localhost (depending of sorting or numbers first or letters first, this could be the first or the last)

by the moment as far as I see the rest is working properly.
Roses don't bloom on the sailor's grave

Corsair.

fred

Quote from: Corsair on May 19, 2010, 09:36:28 AM
Quote- Add: Computer: Sorting.

I don't know but I guess that is not working properly.

now the sorting in computers same range:
descending IP, ascending port (port the same for all)
localhost
xxx.xxx.1.6
xxx.xxx.1.5
xxx.xxx.1.3
xxx.xxx.1.100

but supposed to be:

xxx.xxx.1.3
xxx.xxx.1.5
xxx.xxx.1.6
xxx.xxx.1.100
localhost (depending of sorting or numbers first or letters first, this could be the first or the last)

by the moment as far as I see the rest is working properly.

Yep that's a dilemma 6 5 3 1 is a correct sorting, but not so logical for numbers.
If you have IP and names mixed, what to do.

fred

Keep a watch on the history, I changed some things.

jjwhalen

Quote from: fred on May 19, 2010, 10:57:48 AM
Keep a watch on the history, I changed some things.

I've been doing that.

  • The "aborted by project" issue looks to be fixed now (thanks).
  • The new Use column in History looks OK; pre-0.56 History entries all have "?" in Use, but that probably can't be helped with the new column definition and all.
  • The new color options on History appear to be working OK.

Question: are the Computation error codes in History/Status the standard BOINC error codes, or are they locally generated by BoincTasks itself?

Finally: I'm sorry to be a pest about this "alternating stripes" thing, but...with all the color combinations now possible on the History tab, it would be helpful to be able to turn them off there as well.  I cite my original rationale when I suggested it for the Tasks tab.

Keep up the good work; BT is really shaping up nicely.

B/w


fred

Quote from: jjwhalen on May 20, 2010, 02:40:39 AM
Quote from: fred on May 19, 2010, 10:57:48 AM
Keep a watch on the history, I changed some things.

I've been doing that.

  • The "aborted by project" issue looks to be fixed now (thanks).
    1)
  • The new Use column in History looks OK; pre-0.56 History entries all have "?" in Use, but that probably can't be helped with the new column definition and all.
  • The new color options on History appear to be working OK.

2) Question: are the Computation error codes in History/Status the standard BOINC error codes, or are they locally generated by BoincTasks itself?

3) Finally: I'm sorry to be a pest about this "alternating stripes" thing, but...with all the color combinations now possible on the History tab, it would be helpful to be able to turn them off there as well.  I cite my original rationale when I suggested it for the Tasks tab.

Keep up the good work; BT is really shaping up nicely.

B/w
1) Not invented a time machine yet... Lost is lost.
2) Standard BOINC / Project error codes as reported by the BOINC client as exit codes.
3) Is in the bug list, easy to fix.

Corsair

log tab,

some work units appears with no running time?? all other fields correctly shown.
Roses don't bloom on the sailor's grave

Corsair.

fred

Quote from: Corsair on May 20, 2010, 11:38:13 AM
log tab,

some work units appears with no running time?? all other fields correctly shown.
Never seen that one.
Can you give me an example?

Corsair

#7
Quote from: fred on May 20, 2010, 03:19:32 PM
Quote from: Corsair on May 20, 2010, 11:38:13 AM
log tab,

some work units appears with no running time?? all other fields correctly shown.
Never seen that one.
Can you give me an example?


Collatz Conjecture   2.09 Collatz x64 ATI Opt. (ati13ati)           collatz_1274273981_66052                   00:46:38 (00:46:36)   20-05-2010 19:40   20-05-2010 19:40   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1265067_1274292757                       20-05-2010 19:36   20-05-2010 19:36   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1197372_1274281069   00:04:09 (00:00:04)   20-05-2010 19:31   20-05-2010 19:32   Reportado: Correcto
Collatz Conjecture   2.09 Collatz x64 ATI Opt. (ati13ati)      collatz_1274273981_66055                   00:46:36 (00:46:35)   20-05-2010 18:53   20-05-2010 18:53   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1240731_1274288613   00:04:09 (00:00:04)   20-05-2010 18:50   20-05-2010 18:51   Reportado: Correcto
Enigma@Home      5.22 Enigma 0.76b-Opt                 wrmkx102_0_13680852_71                               20-05-2010 18:49   20-05-2010 18:49   Reportado: Correcto


the 2nd line and the last one have no running time.
Roses don't bloom on the sailor's grave

Corsair.

fred

#8
Quote from: Corsair on May 20, 2010, 07:48:04 PM
Quote from: fred on May 20, 2010, 03:19:32 PM
Quote from: Corsair on May 20, 2010, 11:38:13 AM
log tab,

some work units appears with no running time?? all other fields correctly shown.
Never seen that one.
Can you give me an example?


Collatz Conjecture   2.09 Collatz x64 ATI Opt. (ati13ati)           collatz_1274273981_66052                   00:46:38 (00:46:36)   20-05-2010 19:40   20-05-2010 19:40   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1265067_1274292757                       20-05-2010 19:36   20-05-2010 19:36   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1197372_1274281069   00:04:09 (00:00:04)   20-05-2010 19:31   20-05-2010 19:32   Reportado: Correcto
Collatz Conjecture   2.09 Collatz x64 ATI Opt. (ati13ati)      collatz_1274273981_66055                   00:46:36 (00:46:35)   20-05-2010 18:53   20-05-2010 18:53   Reportado: Correcto
Milkyway@home      0.23 Milkyway Opt. x64 ATI (ati13ati)   de_new_test2_1240731_1274288613   00:04:09 (00:00:04)   20-05-2010 18:50   20-05-2010 18:51   Reportado: Correcto
Enigma@Home      5.22 Enigma 0.76b-Opt                 wrmkx102_0_13680852_71                               20-05-2010 18:49   20-05-2010 18:49   Reportado: Correcto


the 2nd line and the last one have no running time.
Probably missed them, the completed and reported are really close. The history now reports missed tasks that have been seen running.
I make a note of this to check if I can do anything.

jjwhalen

#9
Quote from: fred on May 20, 2010, 06:39:19 AM
--SNIP--

1) Not invented a time machine yet... Lost is lost.

--SNIP--

You might be able to borrow the TARDIS from BBC Wales; they've had it for 40+ years (Earth time) ;D

B/w


fred

Quote from: jjwhalen on May 21, 2010, 11:57:27 PM
Quote from: fred on May 20, 2010, 06:39:19 AM
--SNIP--

1) Not invented a time machine yet... Lost is lost.

--SNIP--

You might be able to borrow the TARDIS from BBC Wales; they've had it for 40+ years (Earth time) ;D

B/w
I did contact the doctor but no go.  ;D

John C

This is quite likely already known, but I didn't see it so I'll post it anyway.

In the ColorsBoincTasks options in version .56, under Warnings, CPU Ratio and GPU Ratio are reversed.  the CPU setting is applied to GPU tasks and vice versa.

fred

Quote from: John C on June 03, 2010, 02:29:40 AM
This is quite likely already known, but I didn't see it so I'll post it anyway.

In the ColorsBoincTasks options in version .56, under Warnings, CPU Ratio and GPU Ratio are reversed.  the CPU setting is applied to GPU tasks and vice versa.
No not reported, but now it's fixed.