Column in tasks tab for project weight

[hucker]

I know this may be an odd thing to ask for, and maybe I'm the only one that wants it, but if you could add a tickbox to allow adding a column to show the project's weight, so I can sort by it, I'd be extremely happy :-)  I'm attached to 13 projects, some a lot higher weight than others, so it would be nice to see the important ones at the top of the list.

[fred]

I know this may be an odd thing to ask for, and maybe I'm the only one that wants it, but if you could add a tickbox to allow adding a column to show the project's weight, so I can sort by it, I'd be extremely happy :-)  I'm attached to 13 projects, some a lot higher weight than others, so it would be nice to see the important ones at the top of the list.

Like the Share% in the Projects tab?

[hucker]

I know this may be an odd thing to ask for, and maybe I'm the only one that wants it, but if you could add a tickbox to allow adding a column to show the project's weight, so I can sort by it, I'd be extremely happy :-)  I'm attached to 13 projects, some a lot higher weight than others, so it would be nice to see the important ones at the top of the list.

Like the Share% in the Projects tab?

Yes, that's the one.  I wanted to put my high priority projects at the top of the task list.  They're currently in alphabetical order.

[fred]

Yes, that's the one.  I wanted to put my high priority projects at the top of the task list.  They're currently in alphabetical order.
Add to the list.

[fred]

Added in V 1.84

[hucker]

Added in V 1.84

It doesn't seem to work right.  It's behaving as though there's another sort above it, but I can't work out what.  I added the share% column, and only sorted by that (I removed the ^2 and ^3 with shift and ctrl).  If I sort by anything else like memory usage, it sorts correctly.  Sorry, rather large screenshot follows, I have a lot of computers and monitors :-)

[fred]

Let's see if I can find anything added to the todo list

[fred]

The problem, the numbers are much much higher than I expected anyone to use.
Fixed 1.85

[hucker]

The problem, the numbers are much much higher than I expected anyone to use.
Fixed 1.85

Oops sorry.  I do that to make rare projects like CPDN that hardly ever have work take over the machine when stuff is available.

[fred]

The problem, the numbers are much much higher than I expected anyone to use.
Fixed 1.85

Oops sorry.  I do that to make rare projects like CPDN that hardly ever have work take over the machine when stuff is available.

Expect the unexpected, anyway it should work in 1.85, I tested 10,000,000

[hucker]

The problem, the numbers are much much higher than I expected anyone to use.
Fixed 1.85

Oops sorry.  I do that to make rare projects like CPDN that hardly ever have work take over the machine when stuff is available.

Expect the unexpected, anyway it should work in 1.85, I tested 10,000,000

Yes, working fine thanks. I don't suppose you could introduce the ability to do a 4th tier sorting?  AFAIK there's only 3 at the moment.