BT 0.42

Started by Corsair, February 22, 2010, 01:01:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Corsair

Hi all,

still I got the fix about sorting, I use only sorting with two columns, but every time I run BT "Tasks" and "Transfers" tab are sorted by means of three columns. ??
Roses don't bloom on the sailor's grave

Corsair.

Pepo

I've noticed this problem today on BT 0.41 and as there is no related change mentioned in the change list, I'm reporting it here although 0.42 (currently) does not seem to manifest the problem.
---
The Lattice Project - Garli 5.13, task 284462300.6323525377828851.2_0
Since 2-3 minutes from its beginning, I've noticed that in Boinc Tasks this task's progress seems to be stuck %-wise - now after elapsed = 22:49:08 (20:52:42), CPU% = 84.56, Progress = 0.992%, Remaining time = 94d,23:37:51, deadline in a week.
OTOH, Boinc Manager showed the task as progressing since its beginning, now (a minute or two later) Elapsed = 22:51:56, Progress = 25.924%, To completion = 2279:39:23 (similar 94.5 days).

The difference is the Progress %, it was nearly always that low in BoincTasks.

Details from the client_state.xml:

    <active_task>
        <project_master_url>http://boinc.umiacs.umd.edu/</project_master_url>
        <result_name>284462300.6323525377828851.2_0</result_name>
        <active_task_state>1</active_task_state>
        <app_version_num>513</app_version_num>
        <slot>15</slot>
        <pid>488</pid>
        <checkpoint_cpu_time>75285.190000</checkpoint_cpu_time>
        <checkpoint_elapsed_time>82302.245195</checkpoint_elapsed_time>
        <fraction_done>0.259241</fraction_done>
        <current_cpu_time>75433.770000</current_cpu_time>
        <swap_size>1019482112.000000</swap_size>
        <working_set_size>616804352.000000</working_set_size>
        <working_set_size_smoothed>616804352.000000</working_set_size_smoothed>
        <page_fault_rate>0.000000</page_fault_rate>
    </active_task>

Info obtained using the boinccmd.exe:

    31) -----------
       name: 284462300.6323525377828851.2_0
       WU name: 284462300.6323525377828851.2
       project URL: http://boinc.umiacs.umd.edu/
       report deadline: Wed Mar 03 21:37:16 2010
       ready to report: no
       got server ack: no
       final CPU time: 0.000000
       state: 2
       scheduler state: 2
       exit_status: 0
       signal: 0
       suspended via GUI: no
       active_task_state: 1
       stderr_out:
       app version num: 513
       checkpoint CPU time: 75888.410000
       current CPU time: 76335.410000
       fraction done: 0.259241
       swap size: 1019482112.000000
       working set size: 616808448.000000
       estimated CPU time remaining: 8207566.865642
       supports graphics: no

...
Later at 29 hours, the progress is finally "non-zero" at 32.379%. I can't tell whether it has always been below 1% or has ben jumping high and low.
...
Yes, definitely jumpin' around. At 30:17:13 and 33.372%, Boinc Tasks is again showing 0.769% ... 0.770% ... 0.805% ... 0.822 slowly rising, but got suspended for now.
Interestingly, at the same time the mini preview gadget window is displaying the progress% correctly.

Few hours later, few seconds prior to upgrade to BT 0.42, the Progress rising towards 1.0%, just after the upgrade the 0.42 is showing 38.901%. But it also could just have been one of these jumps...
Peter

Pepo

For Pirates@Home, Boinc Manager shows in the Project tab: "Scheduler request pending, Requested by project, Scheduler request in progress", whereas Boinc Tasks (sorry, it was the 0.41) was displaying a non-explanatory "sRPCp 7".
Peter

fred

Quote from: Corsair on February 22, 2010, 01:01:09 PM
Hi all,

still I got the fix about sorting, I use only sorting with two columns, but every time I run BT "Tasks" and "Transfers" tab are sorted by means of three columns. ??
Which of the 3 columns are sorted?
What column is sorted incorrectly?

Give me the following info.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER software efmer Boinctasks sorting and give me the numbers for:
tasks_p tasks_s tasks_t (the 3 sorting columns)

fred

Quote from: Pepo on February 22, 2010, 01:39:04 PM
For Pirates@Home, Boinc Manager shows in the Project tab: "Scheduler request pending, Requested by project, Scheduler request in progress", whereas Boinc Tasks (sorry, it was the 0.41) was displaying a non-explanatory "sRPCp 7".
Is in the bug list.

fred

Quote from: Pepo on February 22, 2010, 01:37:06 PM
...
Later at 29 hours, the progress is finally "non-zero" at 32.379%. I can't tell whether it has always been below 1% or has ben jumping high and low.
...
Yes, definitely jumpin' around. At 30:17:13 and 33.372%, Boinc Tasks is again showing 0.769% ... 0.770% ... 0.805% ... 0.822 slowly rising, but got suspended for now.
Interestingly, at the same time the mini preview gadget window is displaying the progress% correctly.

Few hours later, few seconds prior to upgrade to BT 0.42, the Progress rising towards 1.0%, just after the upgrade the 0.42 is showing 38.901%. But it also could just have been one of these jumps...
Added to the bug list: Don't use alternative progress % when the default % is above 0%.

Pepo

Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 01:48:28 AM
Quote from: Pepo on February 22, 2010, 01:37:06 PM
...
Later at 29 hours, the progress is finally "non-zero" at 32.379%. I can't tell whether it has always been below 1% or has ben jumping high and low.
...
Yes, definitely jumpin' around. At 30:17:13 and 33.372%, Boinc Tasks is again showing 0.769% ... 0.770% ... 0.805% ... 0.822 slowly rising, but got suspended for now.
Interestingly, at the same time the mini preview gadget window is displaying the progress% correctly.

Few hours later, few seconds prior to upgrade to BT 0.42, the Progress rising towards 1.0%, just after the upgrade the 0.42 is showing 38.901%. But it also could just have been one of these jumps...
Added to the bug list: Don't use alternative progress % when the default % is above 0%.
Unfortunately I do not understand the issue :) never mind. (Or, is it for cases when/while the application does not report any % progress at all?)
Since the upgrade to 0.42, I've never noticed a progress under 1% - it was continuously moving through 40-50-60-70%.
Peter

Pepo

Occasionally it happens in the Transfers, that more data is actually reported as transferred than the net size (be it the overhead or any error), Boinc Manager displays it like (now in one of my Rosetta uploads) "100% 80.39/79.79KB". For the same upload, BT is displaying "100.755% 81K", the blue background seems to match the progress rectangle. (I've a snapshot picture around.) (* Could we get the "so far transferred data" with resolution to at least 3 decimal places, like 80.4 K or 365 K or 6.72 M?) (* Could we get displayed also the amount "to be transferred"?)

But I've also noticed one transfer to Spinhenge, not noticed the bytes, but the final progress was 111.11% and the blue background was way over the progress' rectangle - touching the number of transferred data in the adjacent column. I guess that the %-tage could freely go over 100% (if much more was transferred than planned), but the colored background should not leave the rectangle...
Peter

efmer

Quote from: Pepo on February 23, 2010, 12:09:51 PM
Occasionally it happens in the Transfers, that more data is actually reported as transferred than the net size (be it the overhead or any error), Boinc Manager displays it like (now in one of my Rosetta uploads) "100% 80.39/79.79KB". For the same upload, BT is displaying "100.755% 81K", the blue background seems to match the progress rectangle. (I've a snapshot picture around.) (* Could we get the "so far transferred data" with resolution to at least 3 decimal places, like 80.4 K or 365 K or 6.72 M?) (* Could we get displayed also the amount "to be transferred"?)

But I've also noticed one transfer to Spinhenge, not noticed the bytes, but the final progress was 111.11% and the blue background was way over the progress' rectangle - touching the number of transferred data in the adjacent column. I guess that the %-tage could freely go over 100% (if much more was transferred than planned), but the colored background should not leave the rectangle...
I will limit the % to 100% as the rest is probably overhead or retries.  It happens more frequently when the connection is busy.

fred

Quote from: Pepo on February 23, 2010, 11:57:52 AM
Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 01:48:28 AM
Quote from: Pepo on February 22, 2010, 01:37:06 PM
...
Later at 29 hours, the progress is finally "non-zero" at 32.379%. I can't tell whether it has always been below 1% or has ben jumping high and low.
...
Yes, definitely jumpin' around. At 30:17:13 and 33.372%, Boinc Tasks is again showing 0.769% ... 0.770% ... 0.805% ... 0.822 slowly rising, but got suspended for now.
Interestingly, at the same time the mini preview gadget window is displaying the progress% correctly.

Few hours later, few seconds prior to upgrade to BT 0.42, the Progress rising towards 1.0%, just after the upgrade the 0.42 is showing 38.901%. But it also could just have been one of these jumps...
Added to the bug list: Don't use alternative progress % when the default % is above 0%.
Unfortunately I do not understand the issue :) never mind. (Or, is it for cases when/while the application does not report any % progress at all?)
Since the upgrade to 0.42, I've never noticed a progress under 1% - it was continuously moving through 40-50-60-70%.
I removed the bug report, when you notice it again let me know.

Corsair

Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 12:55:17 AM
Quote from: Corsair on February 22, 2010, 01:01:09 PM
Hi all,

still I got the fix about sorting, I use only sorting with two columns, but every time I run BT "Tasks" and "Transfers" tab are sorted by means of three columns. ??
Which of the 3 columns are sorted?
What column is sorted incorrectly?

Give me the following info.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER software efmer Boinctasks sorting and give me the numbers for:
tasks_p tasks_s tasks_t (the 3 sorting columns)

I want sorting only by two columns, not by three.
tasks_p 517
tasks_s 267
tasks_t 521
Roses don't bloom on the sailor's grave

Corsair.

fred

Quote from: Corsair on February 26, 2010, 08:33:34 PM
Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 12:55:17 AM
Quote from: Corsair on February 22, 2010, 01:01:09 PM
Hi all,

still I got the fix about sorting, I use only sorting with two columns, but every time I run BT "Tasks" and "Transfers" tab are sorted by means of three columns. ??
Which of the 3 columns are sorted?
What column is sorted incorrectly?

Give me the following info.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER software efmer Boinctasks sorting and give me the numbers for:
tasks_p tasks_s tasks_t (the 3 sorting columns)

I want sorting only by two columns, not by three.
tasks_p 517
tasks_s 267
tasks_t 521
I should be able to solve this in the next version.
I've done some extensive hiking over huge boulders, so not today. ;D

glennaxl

Progressbar is out of its box and way over 100%.


jjwhalen

Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 10:19:22 PM
Quote from: Pepo on February 23, 2010, 11:57:52 AM
Quote from: fred on February 23, 2010, 01:48:28 AM
Quote from: Pepo on February 22, 2010, 01:37:06 PM
...
Later at 29 hours, the progress is finally "non-zero" at 32.379%. I can't tell whether it has always been below 1% or has ben jumping high and low.
...
Yes, definitely jumpin' around. At 30:17:13 and 33.372%, Boinc Tasks is again showing 0.769% ... 0.770% ... 0.805% ... 0.822 slowly rising, but got suspended for now.
Interestingly, at the same time the mini preview gadget window is displaying the progress% correctly.

Few hours later, few seconds prior to upgrade to BT 0.42, the Progress rising towards 1.0%, just after the upgrade the 0.42 is showing 38.901%. But it also could just have been one of these jumps...
Added to the bug list: Don't use alternative progress % when the default % is above 0%.
Unfortunately I do not understand the issue :) never mind. (Or, is it for cases when/while the application does not report any % progress at all?)
Since the upgrade to 0.42, I've never noticed a progress under 1% - it was continuously moving through 40-50-60-70%.
I removed the bug report, when you notice it again let me know.

Just to add to the confusion on this issue:

I'm seeing behavior similar to this only on one of three hosts (quad core/GPU, Vista SP2) with 3 PrimeGrid tasks running in Panic Mode with deadline warning.  BT .42 shows progress as a fraction of a percent, climbing slowly, while BM shows the same tasks at a more believable progress (two at 6~7%, the other at 12.x%.  (This agrees with the boinc_task_state.xml.)  The fourth CPU core has a PrimeGrid task also in Panic Mode (but no deadline warning) and BT shows progress in agreement with BM.

My other 2 hosts (both dual core/no GPU, Vista SP2), also have PrimeGrid tasks in Panic Mode (but no deadline warning) and BT shows progress in agreement with BM.

I don't envy you the witch hunt for this one.

--NEW ISSUE--

Actually, I thought I saw "something, somewhere" in the forum on this but can't find it.  Tasks running in Panic Mode (see above) continue to show status "Running High P" when suspended (in addition to suspended, user request, whatever).  Tasks running in normal scheduler mode do not continue to show as Running.  This, at least, is consistent across all tasks/hosts.

Best wishes.


efmer

To answer all questions:

I limited the % in transfers to 100%.
Changed the progress % so it should now progress normally. That is; in the first 1% the calculation was done differently.
Now this is only done in the first 0.01%, why because otherwise you can't see GPU tasks progress in the first couple of seconds.